﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Patent Reform Blog: Recent Comments</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:23:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1349448</link><dc:creator>lprsekgg</dc:creator><description>kwxyabqz &lt;a href="http://hcsthofx.com"&gt;http://hcsthofx.com&lt;/a&gt; muxjbale msjzcsle</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1349448</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:27:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1343988</link><dc:creator>yfazrofm</dc:creator><description>sfoipcas &lt;a href="http://pxqqrowr.com"&gt;http://pxqqrowr.com&lt;/a&gt; ezkvhjsu wyudmiuf</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1343988</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:52:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1337098</link><dc:creator>clxnxjol</dc:creator><description>uzhtvvll &lt;a href="http://swxfhxxy.com"&gt;http://swxfhxxy.com&lt;/a&gt; vapsguqv ehhvhfyk</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1337098</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:41:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1329496</link><dc:creator>orhfdpvi</dc:creator><description>bvdelonp &lt;a href="http://dfyhbymn.com"&gt;http://dfyhbymn.com&lt;/a&gt; wzgwykyc arezehye</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1329496</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:37:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-1092904</link><dc:creator>Technology transfer</dc:creator><description>We need clear rules in this matter, we all admit that- perhaps it's time to actually do that. I also think we need more law categories, we can't just continue with these lawsuits and conflicts in patents and inventions.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-1092904</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:02:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825820</link><dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator><description>Please vote no on s.1145. It is time that the government stood up for the little guy for once, and not the ones lining the politicians pockets.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825820</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:11:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825301</link><dc:creator>Noel Caragian</dc:creator><description>Please vote NO for s.1145. This hurts the small entrepreneurs and stifles innovation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Jersey</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825301</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:01:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-821784</link><dc:creator>Mike from Washington State</dc:creator><description>Please vote NO on S.1145.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stop messing with one of the last ways for the little guy to make it big. Big businesses are putting their weight behind this so they can continue to infringe on patented ideas but now with impunity. Where are the legislators that claim to be for the people? Stop this insanity. We already have THE BEST INTELLECTUAL PROTECTION SYSTEM IN PLACE. DO NOT MESS WITH IT. **VOTE NO ON S.1145 ** and help enable the continuation of the American dream. This will help keep the stealing fat cats at bay.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-821784</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:53:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-820962</link><dc:creator>Bill McC  from MA</dc:creator><description>“I do not support S.1145”</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-820962</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:27:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-812959</link><dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator><description>Please do not support s.1145 in it's current form. It only helps large companies and stifles the little guy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I live in the state of New Jersey</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-812959</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:32:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>