﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"><channel rdf:about="/comments/rss.aspx"><title>Patent Reform Blog: Recent Comments</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com</link><description /><dc:publisher>Quick Blogcast</dc:publisher><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" /><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1349448" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1343988" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1337098" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1329496" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-1092904" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825820" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825301" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-821784" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-820962" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-812959" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1349448"><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1349448</link><description><![CDATA[kwxyabqz <a href="http://hcsthofx.com">http://hcsthofx.com</a> muxjbale msjzcsle]]></description><dc:creator>lprsekgg</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-08T17:27:26Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1343988"><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1343988</link><description><![CDATA[sfoipcas <a href="http://pxqqrowr.com">http://pxqqrowr.com</a> ezkvhjsu wyudmiuf]]></description><dc:creator>yfazrofm</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-06T08:52:25Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1337098"><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1337098</link><description><![CDATA[uzhtvvll <a href="http://swxfhxxy.com">http://swxfhxxy.com</a> vapsguqv ehhvhfyk]]></description><dc:creator>clxnxjol</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-04T00:41:23Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1329496"><title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1329496</link><description><![CDATA[bvdelonp <a href="http://dfyhbymn.com">http://dfyhbymn.com</a> wzgwykyc arezehye]]></description><dc:creator>orhfdpvi</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-09-01T15:37:43Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-1092904"><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-1092904</link><description><![CDATA[We need clear rules in this matter, we all admit that- perhaps it's time to actually do that. I also think we need more law categories, we can't just continue with these lawsuits and conflicts in patents and inventions.]]></description><dc:creator>Technology transfer</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-06-03T09:02:25Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825820"><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825820</link><description><![CDATA[Please vote no on s.1145. It is time that the government stood up for the little guy for once, and not the ones lining the politicians pockets.]]></description><dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-12T10:11:59Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825301"><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825301</link><description><![CDATA[Please vote NO for s.1145. This hurts the small entrepreneurs and stifles innovation. <br /><br />New Jersey]]></description><dc:creator>Noel Caragian</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-12T06:01:27Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-821784"><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-821784</link><description><![CDATA[Please vote NO on S.1145.<br /><br />Stop messing with one of the last ways for the little guy to make it big. Big businesses are putting their weight behind this so they can continue to infringe on patented ideas but now with impunity. Where are the legislators that claim to be for the people? Stop this insanity. We already have THE BEST INTELLECTUAL PROTECTION SYSTEM IN PLACE. DO NOT MESS WITH IT. **VOTE NO ON S.1145 ** and help enable the continuation of the American dream. This will help keep the stealing fat cats at bay.]]></description><dc:creator>Mike from Washington State</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-10T11:53:45Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-820962"><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-820962</link><description><![CDATA[“I do not support S.1145”]]></description><dc:creator>Bill McC  from MA</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-09T20:27:49Z</dc:date></item><item rdf:about="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-812959"><title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title><link>http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-812959</link><description><![CDATA[Please do not support s.1145 in it's current form. It only helps large companies and stifles the little guy.<br /><br />I live in the state of New Jersey]]></description><dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-05T21:32:23Z</dc:date></item></rdf:RDF>