﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Patent Reform Blog: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2008-12-02T21:29:30Z</updated>
	<id>http://patentreformblog.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link rel="self" href="http://patentreformblog.com/comments/atom.aspx" />
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1349448" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-09-08:1349448</id>
		<author>
			<name>lprsekgg</name>
			<uri>http://gkfmrjzm.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-09-08T17:27:26Z</updated>
		<published>2008-09-08T17:27:26Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[kwxyabqz <a href="http://hcsthofx.com">http://hcsthofx.com</a> muxjbale msjzcsle]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1343988" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-09-06:1343988</id>
		<author>
			<name>yfazrofm</name>
			<uri>http://arsqmsld.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-09-06T08:52:25Z</updated>
		<published>2008-09-06T08:52:25Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[sfoipcas <a href="http://pxqqrowr.com">http://pxqqrowr.com</a> ezkvhjsu wyudmiuf]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1337098" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-09-04:1337098</id>
		<author>
			<name>clxnxjol</name>
			<uri>http://hmrwpltr.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-09-04T00:41:23Z</updated>
		<published>2008-09-04T00:41:23Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[uzhtvvll <a href="http://swxfhxxy.com">http://swxfhxxy.com</a> vapsguqv ehhvhfyk]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/13/patent-examiners-voice-opposition-to-patent-reform-act.aspx#comment-1329496" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-09-01:1329496</id>
		<author>
			<name>orhfdpvi</name>
			<uri>http://uxxmoppj.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-09-01T15:37:43Z</updated>
		<published>2008-09-01T15:37:43Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[bvdelonp <a href="http://dfyhbymn.com">http://dfyhbymn.com</a> wzgwykyc arezehye]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-1092904" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-06-03:1092904</id>
		<author>
			<name>Technology transfer</name>
			<uri>http://www.yissum.co.il/</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-06-03T09:02:25Z</updated>
		<published>2008-06-03T09:02:25Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[We need clear rules in this matter, we all admit that- perhaps it's time to actually do that. I also think we need more law categories, we can't just continue with these lawsuits and conflicts in patents and inventions.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825820" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-02-12:825820</id>
		<author>
			<name>Jerry</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-02-12T10:11:59Z</updated>
		<published>2008-02-12T10:11:59Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Please vote no on s.1145. It is time that the government stood up for the little guy for once, and not the ones lining the politicians pockets.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-825301" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-02-12:825301</id>
		<author>
			<name>Noel Caragian</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-02-12T06:01:27Z</updated>
		<published>2008-02-12T06:01:27Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Please vote NO for s.1145. This hurts the small entrepreneurs and stifles innovation. <br /><br />New Jersey]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-821784" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-02-10:821784</id>
		<author>
			<name>Mike from Washington State</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-02-10T11:53:45Z</updated>
		<published>2008-02-10T11:53:45Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Please vote NO on S.1145.<br /><br />Stop messing with one of the last ways for the little guy to make it big. Big businesses are putting their weight behind this so they can continue to infringe on patented ideas but now with impunity. Where are the legislators that claim to be for the people? Stop this insanity. We already have THE BEST INTELLECTUAL PROTECTION SYSTEM IN PLACE. DO NOT MESS WITH IT. **VOTE NO ON S.1145 ** and help enable the continuation of the American dream. This will help keep the stealing fat cats at bay.]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-820962" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-02-09:820962</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bill McC  from MA</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-02-09T20:27:49Z</updated>
		<published>2008-02-09T20:27:49Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[“I do not support S.1145”]]></content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Vote NO on S.1145</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx#comment-812959" />
		<id>tag:patentreformblog.com,2008-02-05:812959</id>
		<author>
			<name>Paul</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2008-02-05T21:32:23Z</updated>
		<published>2008-02-05T21:32:23Z</published>
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[Please do not support s.1145 in it's current form. It only helps large companies and stifles the little guy.<br /><br />I live in the state of New Jersey]]></content>
	</entry>
</feed>